Access-risk-analysis: Articles & Insights

Most access risk tools analyze SoD at the transaction code level: if a user has tcode A and tcode B, flag a conflict. Authorization-level analysis goes deeper. It checks whether the user's authorization object values actually overlap, so conflicts that share no company code, plant, or organizational unit are filtered out. The distinction matters: transaction-level analysis on a large SAP landscape typically produces 3-10x more false positives than authorization-level analysis.

Critical access is a category of access risk separate from Segregation of Duties: transactions that cause damage on their own, without needing a conflicting partner. This guide lists the critical transactions every SAP environment should monitor, explains how to detect them with access risk analysis, and shows how MTC Skopos catches them in the same pass as SoD.

Over-privileged users are the quiet third category of access risk, behind SoD and critical access. They hold authorizations that expand their fraud surface, inflate FUE licensing, and create audit findings, even though nothing about their daily work requires the access. This guide explains how privilege creep happens, how to detect it with access risk analysis, and how to remediate without breaking business operations.

An access risk report documents the access risks in an ERP landscape — SoD violations, critical access, and over-privileged users — plus recommended remediation. MTC Skopos delivers the underlying risk data as structured models ready for Power BI, Tableau, or any BI tool, so your access risk report reflects your priorities rather than a vendor's fixed template.

SAP Access Risk Analysis (ARA) is the process of evaluating user permissions to identify SoD conflicts, critical access, and over-provisioning. MTC Skopos delivers fast, on-premise ARA with step-by-step remediation and flat-rate pricing — an alternative to SAP GRC Access Control, Pathlock, and cloud-based access risk tools.